I don't understand why the charges for my bathroom are as high as they are. I did clean the bathroom. Especially the shower, it was a little stained when i moved in last year and i can't see on the photos why i got charged for cleaning the toilet area.

The floor is in the exact same condition as it was when I moved in two years ago. I never wear shoes or eat in the room to prevent any damage to the floor.I have attached a timestamped image from my move-in date showing the original condition of the floor, along with two videos that show glimpses of the floor around the room.I am fine with cleaning charges, but a replacement charge is inappropriate to me.

I am concerned that I am being charged Turn Damage Fees for the flooring in my bedroom. I took documentation of the state of my room as I was finally leaving the premises and I was sent photos by Station 42 and I do not see any damages to the flooring in them. Our unit had a reported AC unit leak, unrelated to our use, during the year, to which the maintenance came and installed fans to dry underneath the floorboards to my hall and bedroom flooring. I would like to sort this charge out as soon as possible as I do not believe I should be charged for damage fees. Thank you.

I am disputing the $275 cleaning/trash charge assessed to Yoni, Santo, and me because we were not responsible for the condition that caused it.All three of us moved out before the lease ended and fully cleaned our own rooms, bathrooms, and belongings before leaving. Yoni and I were not in Tampa at all during the summer leading up to move-out. Santo remained at the apartment but was rarely home, and cleaned up after himself when he did use shared spaces.The mess in Room D and its bathroom, the kitchen, and the TV room was left by our fourth roommate, Keegan Betzer — not by us. Keegan lived in that unit for multiple years, longer than the rest of us, and used the kitchen far more often (multiple times a day, compared to rarely for us). We had repeated conflicts with him during the lease about him leaving trash by the door instead of taking it to the dumpster, so this was a known pattern, not a one-time thing. Any items I left in the kitchen, I retrieved before moving out.Attached is a note Santo posted in the kitchen during the lease after repeated issues with Keegan leaving trash in the unit, describing worms and flies from trash left out. This reflects the ongoing pattern we referenced above.We did not know about the apartment's actual condition until we received these charges, and no ability to control or address a mess we weren't there for. A Station 42 staff member I spoke with independently commented that Keegan had not cleaned up after himself and left us to deal with the consequences.We're requesting that the $275 charge for Yoni, Santo, and me be removed, since it does not reflect the condition we left our rooms and shared space in. If management believes we hold any specific responsibility, we're requesting an itemized breakdown showing exactly what portion is attributed to each of us and why.

I am disputing this cleaning charge because it is unfair to hold me, Vishnu, and Santo financially responsible for the condition the apartment was left in.The three of us moved out early and were either completely gone from the apartment or only there very rarely toward the end of the lease. The trash, dirty dishes, sink, utensils, kitchen mess, and the condition of Room D were not caused by us. We cleaned up after ourselves and removed our belongings when we moved out.The remaining mess was caused by another roommate, Keegan, who left behind his belongings, trash, and other items before moving out. None of the three of us were aware that he had left the apartment in that condition until we received this unexpectedly large cleaning charge.We should not be charged for another resident’s actions simply because we were all listed on the same apartment. There is a clear difference between normal shared responsibility and charging residents for trash, belongings, dishes, and mess that were specifically left behind by someone else after we had already moved out.We are extremely frustrated that this charge was applied to us without any attempt to determine who was actually responsible for the condition of the apartment. We are requesting that the cleaning charge assessed to me, Vishnu, and Santo be removed. If management believes we are responsible for any specific portion of the cleaning, we would also like to see the move-out inspection documentation, photographs, an itemized breakdown of the charges, and an explanation of what specifically is being attributed to each of us.We should not be expected to pay a significant cleaning fee for a mess we did not create, belongings we did not leave behind, and a condition we had no knowledge of after we had already moved out.Thank you for your attention to this matter.

I have already sent 4 of these dispute forms and no one has responded. Instead I get sent the list of charges again that I am disputing. I am being charged for carpet “damages”. I vaccumed before I left the night of the 30th of July and nothing was dirty or damaged. The picture I was sent to show me the “damages” has nothing in the picture that looks damaged and has nothing in it to prove it was my apartment let alone my room.

For the most part, everything was really good. However, when I walked into my apartment for the first time, I noticed that it was extremely dusty, especially where the AC unit's in. It didn't look like someone cleaned the apartment before we all got here.

I am being charged for a full carpet replacement even though the carpet does not appear to be damaged. I understand that there is a stain near the door, as shown in the photos you provided, and I am willing to pay a reasonable cleaning fee if necessary.However, the other photos submitted show no additional stains or excessive damage to the carpet. I do not understand how one stain near the door would justify replacing the entire carpet rather than simply cleaning the affected area.I will attach the photos you provided for reference, as they show that there is no excessive damage that would require a full replacement. I am requesting that the carpet replacement charge be removed and that I only be charged an appropriate cleaning fee. Please send me an email to discuss further if you do not understand what I’m saying.

The damage fee I was sent was for the carpet in my room. I left Aug 30th after I had finished vacuuming. The carpet had no stains or damages. The pictures I was sent of the carpet had nothing wrong in the photo. If there was something wrong it was not made clear what it was. It is not proven that the photos were taken in my room. So I will not be forced to pay something that wasn’t there when I left.

I was charged with $325 due to damages to the carpeting, even though I have not caused any damage to the carpet and left the carpeting the same way I found it. I would like to dispute these charges. As mentioned I have not caused any damage to the carpeting, making these charges unjustified.